fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agothis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzimagemessage-square309fedilinkarrow-up11.37Karrow-down161
arrow-up11.31Karrow-down1imagethis one goes out to the arts & humanitiesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square309fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 months agoThat stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoI said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·3 months agoWhat if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoWell, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 months agoYou just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
minus-squareUnderwaterSwift@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoYou know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right
That stuff is not free, for example. The energy and water usage is simply not economical.
I said basically free. It costs a fraction of a cent to generate an image, that would take a human a few hours at least.
What if I tell you that the effort that gets put nto the image is a vital part of art?
Well, that’s your opinion. I’m more of a finished product kind of guy.
You just said it: you value more the “product” part of art. Not the “art” part.
You know you can run a lot of these models on your home PC right