• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    The 9K a month had less to do with it than the $30K down, which, again, was only 7.5%, not the 20% people expect.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      than the $30K down,

      Which you had because of that 9k/month

      not the 20% people expect.

      Again, because of the high income

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        The 30K was more because I had been working from home, not buying gas, and not eating out for 3 years. ;)

        • Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          … While making $9k a month.

          Jesus fucking Christ dude your situation is exceptional because you make a fuck-ton more money than most people, it’s not a difficult reality to accept.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      In 2000 we did a zero down, 8% first on 80% and 9.5% second on 20%, at 2.5x our combined salary. Terrible loans and it was really really hard, but it was what we had to do to buy - network tv, one picked-up pizza per week, vacations were driving the kids to see their grandparents, constantly scrambled to pay taxes and insurance, and we just prayed that nothing broke. We know that we were really lucky.