Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid!
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutânâpaste it into its own post, thereâs no quota for posting and the bar really isnât that high
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many âesotericâ right wing freaks, but thereâs no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iâm talking redscare-ish, reality challenged âculture criticsâ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iâm talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyâre inescapable at this point, yet I donât see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnât be surgeons because they didnât believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canât escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
these people said âwhat if we had a church that was also a country with a monarchyâ and then cooked for like 800 years
edit: although I think the actual borders only got defined in like the 20th century?
The pope was king of a large chunk of central Italy for 1000 years until the unification of Italy took away almost all of that territory. The Popes insisted he should have all of Rome and refused to acknowledge the situation from 1870 to 1929, only finally coming to an agreement (with the fucking fascists, hmm).
Iâm pretty sure that the position of the papacy after the fall of Rome was that they should have temporal power not only over the city of Rome but of all the territories of the Papal States that had been annexed by the Kingdom of Italy.
Also note that the popes were terrible secular leaders. The papal states were shitty places to live, even considered by the standards of 19th century Italy, and the popes lived in constant fear of their own subjects. In fact the only thing keeping Rome from finally falling was a garrison of French troops, that had to be withdrawn during the Franco-Prussian war. When the citizens of Rome were given the option to join the Kingdom, they won in a plebiscite. The people who wanted a temporal papacy were the elites and foreign ultramontanes.
Very true. Of course they voted to join in the plebiscite, they had recently overthrown the Pope in 1849 to make a short-lived republic. Unfortunately France under Louis Napoleon (who had personally participated in an 1831 rebellion against the Pope) crushed that Republic to appease those ultramontanes.
The history of the reaction in the 19th century is fascinating. I can recommend this book:
Metternich was so scared of radical students he basically ensured that the universities in Austria-Hungary were hamstrung by political meddling and censorship. This was a great foundation for the war with Prussia later on! /s
God damn history is cool. I have nothing interesting to say but thanks for this. I might actually go pick up that book, do you think itâs suitable for someone who has basically read zero real history books?
Iâd say itâs a bit on the advanced side but if you can find it âoff the back of a truckâ then itâs worth giving it a try.
If I remember correctly, Josef Ressel, one of the inventors of the propeller (there was severa, but he was in Austrial), was arrested as an anarchist after a steam engine powering a propeller exploded.
I am not in favour of exploding engines, but it always struck me as a bit on the paranoid side. Not that better ships for the Austrian navy would have helped against Prussia.
But then again, another propeller inventor, John Ericsson, came up with both the Monitor, a torpedo boat, and a mobile artillery that he tried to sell to Napoleon III, so you never know what propeller inventors can come up with if you donât arrest them as anarchists.