Itte@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.world · 2 months agoDo you use Firefox Sync? Why or why not?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1121arrow-down13
arrow-up1118arrow-down1imageDo you use Firefox Sync? Why or why not?sh.itjust.worksItte@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareCloudless ☼@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up55·2 months agoYes. Because I have too many devices. Firefox sync is easy except that I have to reconfigure settings for each add-on.
minus-squarestepan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoI’m pretty sure I’ve seen some FF addons have an option to sync their setting via FF Sync.
minus-squarekratoz29@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoDoes Chrome sync addon data? I am getting a bit annoyed by the fact that Firefox does not, but actually I don’t remember if Chrome ever did this.
minus-squareConsti@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoIt’s not a question of the browser, it’s the addon. There are separete APIs for local and synced storage (but same interface). Both browsers use the same main api (web extension).
Yes. Because I have too many devices. Firefox sync is easy except that I have to reconfigure settings for each add-on.
I’m pretty sure I’ve seen some FF addons have an option to sync their setting via FF Sync.
Does Chrome sync addon data? I am getting a bit annoyed by the fact that Firefox does not, but actually I don’t remember if Chrome ever did this.
It’s not a question of the browser, it’s the addon. There are separete APIs for local and synced storage (but same interface). Both browsers use the same main api (web extension).
Ditto