Is there a good reason for people who have played the sequel to then play the original? I’ve only played RDR for a dozen or so hours. I liked that the NPCs weren’t hyper-aggro like many are in RDR2, and the UI was less annoying, but the world and gameplay felt kind of lackluster and repetitive. Maybe getting the earlier part of the story makes it worthwhile?
Is there a good reason for people who have played the sequel to then play the original? I’ve only played RDR for a dozen or so hours. I liked that the NPCs weren’t hyper-aggro like many are in RDR2, and the UI was less annoying, but the world and gameplay felt kind of lackluster and repetitive. Maybe getting the earlier part of the story makes it worthwhile?
RDR2 is actually a prequel to RDR, if that helps you in your decision making.
Also the first game is way more arcade-y than the immersive sim of the second.
Maybe they’ll release the zombies expansion…