• Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    It’s a recurrent theme in the history of the world you know, thousands, hundreds of thousands, tens of millions of species killed, never to be seen again.

    No species ever lasts that long.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      There have been many extinction events, and we won’t be the first “nature based extinction event” the planet has seen either.

      Just one of the dumber ones.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        Others have been fairly random. GRBs sterilizing half the planet, asteroid impacts, simple microbiological species fighting for resources whilst unknowingly making their environments unlivable, etc., etc.

        In this case, the writing has been on the wall for decades, completely preventable, but here we are barrelling into it head first none-the-less. Dumber indeed.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hardly. We conserve when we want to.

          The problem is that not everyone shares the same values, and so there are people who are willing to let some species go in exchange for a more comfortable lifestyle (with “more comfortable” in some cases meaning “not starving to death”). Values aren’t objective.

          • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Sorry, I was absolutely dehumanizing and generalizing us as a species. Individually, you’re absolutely right, but the people who need to make the tough decisions to save us all won’t make them and will selfishly take us all into the end with them. Differentiating the subjective opinions and values, at the end of the day, doesn’t really matter.

          • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Why does the cow shark description say it’s unique in having six and sometimes seven gill slits compared to all other sharks having five. Then the frilled shark says it has six gill slits.

            • lunarul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              They’re both part of the Hexanchiformes order, which are seven gill sharks. So the cow shark article is wrong, there are two surviving families with more than five gills.

              • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Thank you, I typically default to assuming I don’t understand or I’m confused when reading up things outside of my wheelhouse. I enjoyed reading up on the sharks you shared! I was trying to decide which one I would want to be if I could decide while laying in bed this morning. Felt silly but fuck it, I’m old, it’s nice to dream.

                • Krauerking
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I hope you picked Goblin shark. You get to be “ugly” and don’t give a fuck and outlive your enemies lives anyways.