• Thassodar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    30 days ago

    I’d agree but there is a lot of “actual journalism” that is freely accessible. ProPublica, for example.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      Is their funding method viable for every single journalism outlet though? Or maybe there better question would be, for every article posted, is there a 501c3 (or otherwise sustainably funded) news outlet that has published coverage on the same story?

      I’m not disagreeing or agreeing with you, I’m just writing out some of my own indecision on the topic. Journalism is vitally important but it seems like it’s very difficult for people to make a living doing it and I don’t know what the answer is.

      • Thassodar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        30 days ago

        I understand your question but it doesn’t address my initial question: why are we posting paywalled links to public news? Everyone was reporting on this,(Edit: I may be wrong about that) I’m sure there is a free independent news source that has a similar article, so why are we putting up a paywall link to a NYT article? Wouldn’t it be more effective to post a link everyone could access?

        Edit: I am now going to look and see if there’s anyone else reporting this, if it is exclusive to NYT, great, but each day I see a interesting article only to get halfway through and get hit with a “money please!” paywall.

        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          30 days ago

          That’s fair. I was definitely using your question to voice something I have been thinking about for a while, more than actually addressing it/you specifically. Sorry about that.