The new MV3 architecture reflects Google’s avowed desire to make browser extensions more performant, private, and secure. But the internet giant’s attempt to do so has been bitterly contested by makers of privacy-protecting and content-blocking extensions, who have argued that the Chocolate Factory’s new software architecture will lead to less effective privacy and content-filtering extensions.

For users of uBlock Origin, which runs on Manifest V2, “options” means using the less capable uBlock Origin Lite, which supports Manifest V3.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Anyone that’s used Librewolf mind offering their opinion on it? That description sounds pretty sweet.

    • Ace! _SL/S@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s the best. Deletes all cookies and browsing data on exit by default. I changed it to keep history and cookies for a handful of sites

      Turned up uBO to strict mode and installed JShelter to get rid of most clientside fingerprinting (this will cause some breakage on a site by site basis though, which is quick to be fixed. Mostly on sites that are dynamically managed by JS instead of the way it’s meant to be)

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Deletes all cookies and browsing data on exit by default

        This would make for an extremely annoying browsing experience.

        • Ace! _SL/S@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Not really, NoScript prevents executing all JavaScript by default. JShelter instead strongly limits what JS can do and spoofs some values to throw of fingerprinters. It also has a network boundary shield (mostly blocking cross sites post/get requests. Same for lan to prevent your local network being scanned etc). And it comes with a fingerprint detector which allows you to see which websites want to track you the most (I avoid those whenever possible)

    • Sanctus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      It is pretty sweet. Used it as my main browser for a year. It comes pretty hardened. Try it out for sure its worth it.

    • VITecNet@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      In my experience, the Flatpak variant of Firefox on Linux is the swiftest among Firefox-based browsers.

    • Teknikal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s a bit too restrictive by default imo, good for privacy but you will need to change quite a few setting if you want to browse normally.

      Despite my opinion it’s the browser I use most on my laptop.

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve had librewolf specific bugs absent in firefox, definitely not a strict upgrade.

    • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s great. It’s essentially Firefox, but without the unnecessary bullshit like Sponsored sites or Pocket integration, and it has some quite significant privacy and security improvements. Also comes with uBlock Origin pre-installed.

    • megane-kun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve used Librewolf until pretty recently and I say it’s not for everyone. It’s hardened Firefox made into its own thing for people who want the benefits of hardened Firefox but don’t want to go through the effort of hardening their Firefox install.

      There are some sites that wouldn’t work in the strictest settings. As far as I remember, the most problematic sites with Librewolf are those that demand way too much in terms of privacy and security, so I took it as a given that if a site doesn’t work with Librewolf (with me using the default settings), it’s not worth it to enter to begin with.