Critics of a new Louisiana law, which makes it a crime to approach within 25 feet (7.6 meters) of a police officer under certain circumstances, fear that the measure could hinder the public’s ability to film officers — a tool that has increasingly been used to hold police accountable.

Under the law, anyone who is convicted of “knowingly or intentionally” approaching an officer, who is “lawfully engaged in the execution of his official duties,” and after being ordered to “stop approaching or retreat” faces up to a $500 fine, up to 60 days in jail or both. The law was signed by Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, Tuesday and goes into effect Aug. 1.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    How close do you need to be to take cell phone video of police without being a distraction?

    25 feet feels a bit much, but understandable. I can certainly record people 25 feet away with very good detail.

    However, does that radius expand if a second cop gets in between and starts walking your way? That sounds like an entrapment issue.

    • PoopDelivery@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s far enough that recording clear video in darker settings would be harder since most zoom lenses suck in low light. Audio would be harder to pickup as well.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Obviously, if shit goes down and people whip out cell phones, it doesn’t magically turn everyone into guerrilla cinematographers bumping elbows with police to get the best angle. So if not 25 feet, what would you say is a respectable buffer zone between bystander and interfering?

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      However, does that radius expand if a second cop gets in between and starts walking your way? That sounds like an entrapment issue.

      If the wording in this article is correct, the radius would stay the same. It talks about approaching officers, not being approached by officers. If they close the gap, that’s on them.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The point of the Arizona law is to prevent you from recording your own encounter with an officer. You can’t ask an officer to stand 25 feet away from your car after being pulled over.

      This needs to be challenged with the “one-party consent” law that allows for both parties of a phone conversation to record if one is recording. If I’m being recorded, I should maintain the right to record.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      25 feet is far enough to prevent most voices that aren’t yelling from being recorded. Any sidewalk next to an officer pulling a car over is restricted, as well as 2 lanes of road. A bailiff restricts most the courtroom. Jails are essentially fucked for incarcerated. Any cop directing traffic could choose any car to fuck over. Be careful at any sporting event where a drunk may get removed.