jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前Windows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1479arrow-down14cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1475arrow-down1external-linkWindows Recall demands an extraordinary level of trust that Microsoft hasn’t earnedarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 个月前message-square25fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareToes♀@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43arrow-down2·9 个月前Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
minus-squareZeppo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down2·9 个月前It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·9 个月前Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
minus-squareNullPointer@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·9 个月前I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
minus-squarejet@hackertalks.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·9 个月前As long as it’s your choice, sure. But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.
Anything that takes data off the computer is a no fly zone.
It doesn’t transmit the data; it supposedly stores it locally. The issue is it’s a huge convenient plaintext trove of information if the system is compromised.
Anything that copies, or persist data to a new location should also be a no-fly zone
I’ll keep my off-site backups, thank you very much.
As long as it’s your choice, sure.
But surprising users and system architects with surprise copies is going to break lots of data security models and behaviors.