The industry that has traditionally powered about a quarter of GDP has been in a downward spiral that policymakers have struggled to halt

All across China, from Beijing in the north, to Shenzhen in the south, millions of newly built homes stand empty and unwanted. There were nearly 391m sq metres of unsold residential property in China as of April, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. That is the equivalent of Manchester and Birmingham combined – and then some – sitting as vacant, unwanted property.

This glut of idle property has caused a headache for the government, shaken the world’s second largest economy and raised tensions over the purpose of housebuilding in a nation where property investment had been viewed as a safe bet.

Since the real estate sector was sent into a tailspin in 2020, caused by the pandemic and a sudden regulatory crackdown, the industry that has traditionally powered about one-quarter of GDP has been in a downward spiral that policymakers have struggled to halt.

The crux of the problem is that, with shaky faith in the economy and big property developers failing to deliver on paid-for apartments, potential homebuyers are keeping their money out of the market.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nah, the situation is way different in the US. The construction quality is way way better due to building codes and actual enforcement of that. Though some construction does fall through the cracks, it’s a good bet that the vast majority of construction here is safe. There is a pricing bubble here, but that’s for different reasons. And renting here is nowhere near as cheap as this person says. They said it would take 114 years to pay back the cost of a house compared to renting. In the US, rent is usually slightly more or even much more than a mortgage and goes up over time, so your worst case scenario is less than 30 years.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes. One reason why new housing in the US is expensive is because there are way more regulations now than there were years ago. Houses now are much safer and built better. But that makes them more expensive.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tell me about it. I’m in the middle of construction right now, and the various hoops I’ve had to jump through and mazes of codes I’ve had to navigate are insane. And it all makes things so much more expensive. And the number of inspections and permit plan check meetings I’ve had to do has taken so much of my time.

        I probably shouldn’t have tried to GC this myself.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Remember that all of those regulations are for a reason. Sometimes the reason is "contractors donated money to an elected official, but it’s usually a good result. It’s better to have higher quality than lower.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Lmao have you seen the new builds in California? It’s not that you can punch through walls, but that you can literally fall through them. “Fire codes” nominally exist, but good luck enforcing them. All the work is shoddily done, things leak (for the one time a year it rains), the garage has exposed nails everywhere, and the doors are barely slapped together. Cabinets are basically an afterthought, the floors are basically hollow, and you can hear everything from your neighbour, your upstairs floor, and the street. A 2b1b in San Jose rents for $3700 a month, but sells for $1.2 million. Your mortgage is a $6400 monthly payment, plus $1200 in monthly property tax, plus home insurance and maintenance. US homes in prime real estate markets are profitable solely because of housing appreciation.

      If you’re talking about a place in Detroit? Yeah, ROI is high, but so is risk, and housing appreciation is low.

      Think about it. If rent was more than the corresponding mortgage, everyone with any amount of capital would acquire infinite homes to fill the gap. The efficient market hypothesis isn’t perfect, but it applies here.

      Edit: if you do things yourself, unfortunately you don’t get the luxury of corrupt and negligent officials so you probably have to build a proper home. Such is life.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve lived in Los Angeles for over 20 years, so I think I have seen what construction is like in California. And I have family in other states who work construction, so I also have an idea of how much stricter the building codes are here in CA (including how much stricter the building inspectors are). Almost everything you complained about is about workmanship or level of finish, not actual build quality. It might not be very sound proof, but it almost definitely won’t fall apart under normal use (there’s a reason that condo in Miami was such huge news). Also, if you are able to fall through a wall with 16" on-center studs and 1/2" drywall then you must be way more dense than I am, since I would have to run fast to get enough speed hitting shoulder first to break through, let alone a slow speed fall into a vertical surface. I’ve never been to China, so I can only repeat what I’ve heard that the quality is much lower than in the US.

        As far as you rent vs buy example, you took the extreme case of Silicon Valley. Even in Los Angeles you can buy a single family home for $1.2M that rents for $6k/mo. You don’t even have to look at Detroit. Your example is also off. A 2b 1b apartment rents for $3700, but a condo of that size is $600k not $1.2M. And the mortgage on $600k is roughly $3200/mo plus $600/mo in taxes. If you look at single family homes, yes you are starting at $1.2M, but those are minimum 3br (or very large 2br) and absolutely not renting for $3700/mo. If you go away from the extreme case of SV and somewhere completely normal like the nice suburbs of Indianapolis, you can buy a small house for $300k that rents for $2000/mo.

          • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            https://www.redfin.com/CA/San-Jose/1995-Sumatra-Ave-95122/home/1729649

            https://www.rent.com/california/san-jose-houses/3-bedroom_2-bathroom?property-type=houses&bbox=-121.8580,37.3009,-121.8151,37.3520

            I can link things too. The house you linked was last sold 40 years ago for $126k, so the person who owns it is renting it out for many times more than their mortgage. You might not be able to rent out a place for more than a mortgage today in that specific city, but if you own it for 5 years then you might be able to. Also, 2br 1ba single family houses in San Jose are fucking weird. If you start looking at 3br 2ba houses in that area then it gets a little more normal. If you look at 2br 1ba condos, the prices are also more normal. But you ignored what I said about Silicon Valley being an extreme case.

            90% of the country you can buy for less than renting. You asked why anyone would rent when buying is cheaper. And the answer is because buying is hard. You need to have a lot of money saved up, which most renters can’t do. You need to be able to pay for repairs, which most renters can’t do. You need to know you aren’t moving jobs any time soon, which a lot of people don’t know. And nowadays you are bidding against corporations and investors who are bidding full cash, and sellers would prefer to do that instead of waiting on a mortgage approval that might fall through.

            • irreticent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              But you ignored what I said about Silicon Valley being an extreme case.

              That’s because they’re not arguing in good faith.

              • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                6 months ago

                Honey, the OP posted a house in what’s essentially the slums of San Jose. It’s sandwiched between a highway and an airport in an act of urban planning that would make Robert Moses weep with pride. Who’s not arguing in good faith?

                • irreticent@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Who’s not arguing in good faith?

                  The one who starts a comment with such a condescending tone. Honey, you seem like the bad guy here.

            • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              So… I take it you’re not from San Jose? Overfelt High is notoriously a highly minority-dominated, economically-disadvantaged, high-crime area. It’s next to the 101, segregated from the rest of the city, has obscene noise pollution, and, again, is notoriously economically-disadvantaged. You would not want to live there.

              Edit: the fact that you would even link to that house shows how out of depth you are in this. That’s fine… I guess LA is an easier housing market to understand. Maybe the Bay Area is different, but you still should really not be linking random shit anyway. It shows that you’re willing to make arbitrary claims without sufficient knowledge on the issue.