• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    And then Google sues the AI provider to stop them from doing that.

    AI is not our tool, it is a corporate tool, for corporate profits, that they deign to let us dabble with, but only when it suits them.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      You could probably train something like that on semi-reasonable consumer hardware. Ads often have a very distinctive style and tone, and you need only a single output - the probability of it being any given second being an ad. It would probably take a lot to run though, you better hope the people who install the extension have good PCs. And, it would probably never get 100% accurate, you’d have to put up with still seeing some ads and having to rewind when it skips over valid video.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        It’s usually even easier than that… In my jurisdiction, ads have to be clearly labeled and identified. It should be relatively trivial to detect this label.

      • iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 days ago

        it might even be ridiculously simple given that ads almost 100% of the time have louder audio than the content by design.