• Ibaudia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m really glad DaVinci Resolve exists to fill the void of a proper video editor too, Kdenlive just ain’t it for me.

    • OR3X@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unfortunately the free version on Linux doesn’t support H.264/H.265 and even the paid version doesn’t support AAC so using Resolve requires you to transcode if you’re using any normal consumer camera.

        • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          The point was probably that if your equipment or sources use aac, you will need to transcode it, losing quality in the process. We don’t always control our media sources and the formats they use.

          • OR3X@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            That’s it exactly. Most consumer camera gear uses H.264/H.265 for video and AAC for audio in an MP4 container and the free version of Davinci Resolve just doesn’t support that on Linux. (But does on Windows)

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              If it even doesn’t support import and export in those formats, you can try externally decode audio and video and store in lossless format. FLAC for audio and something like FFV1 for video.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Since you are cutting video in pieces, applying filters and all the fun stuff, you are transcoding it anyway.

            • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, but then you would be transcoding an already transcoded video, potentially making the losses apparent. It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                It would be better to just transcode once at the exporting process.

                Lossy encoding only happens once in both cases.

                How direct import-export works: input file -> lossy format decompressor of editor -> filters -> lossy format compressor of editor -> output

                How external codecs work: input -> external lossy format decompressor -> intermediate representation(lossless codec, can be just storing raw frames) -> IR decoder of editor -> filters -> IR encoder of editor -> external lossy format compressor -> output

                Both options have only one lossy step - lossy encoder. Or technically two - also filters, but this is editor’s intention.

                • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Oh, I get it now, you mean using a lossless format as intermediate. Well, it would work but still it would be better if they didn’t require this extra work on linux.

      • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Both work well, but DaVinci is better with color grading, audio post-production, visual effects, collaboration, and format support, just to name a few. It’s a professional product made for professionals.