• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 days ago

    That negative or morally questionable topics are advertiser-unfriendly. Of course, advertisers don’t need to run positive or moral ads, though.

    • hdnsmbt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      I know you don’t think that, but imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable. It all comes down to money, of course. “Can’t have my brand associated with sex because some people hate sex and they might not give me their money! Better pretend like we can deny sex exists altogether.” And then the same advertisers advertise beer using boobs.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        imagine thinking sex was negative or morally questionable

        I think lots of Christian denominations find it a necessary evil. I did too before I became an atheist. Still, I think the platforms are so afraid of showing age-inappropriate content to someone they’d rather stash it away to somewhere nobody finds it unless explicitly searching for it.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Of course, advertisers don’t need to run positive or moral ads, though.

      Of course not, they’re the customers so they’re always right. And the “product” is tightly regulated.