fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoConversing with Mathematiciansmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1385arrow-down113
arrow-up1372arrow-down1external-linkConversing with Mathematiciansmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·1 year agoOkay, fine the square roots of 100 are ±10.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoSeems very inaccurate the we can only determine the square root to ±10.
minus-squaresevenapples@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoThat’s not how the square root is defined. You’re confusing “square root of 100” with “the answer to x^2 = 100”. These are different things.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoWhich is why I differentiated between square roots and the principle square root by saying the square roots instead of the square root on the second comment.
minus-squaresevenapples@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·1 year agoso you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNo, I was being pedantic to appease the pedantic assholes.
Okay, fine the square roots of 100 are ±10.
Seems very inaccurate the we can only determine the square root to ±10.
That’s not how the square root is defined.
You’re confusing “square root of 100” with “the answer to x^2 = 100”. These are different things.
Which is why I differentiated between square roots and the principle square root by saying the square roots instead of the square root on the second comment.
so you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?
No, I was being pedantic to appease the pedantic assholes.
deleted by creator
Oops, my bad