• Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    They also agreed to a similar arbitration clause again when purchasing the park tickets. It is insane that the disney lawyers even mentioned disney+. They had a more recent and relevant agreement right there.

    Either way, I hope they lose. Fuck disney and forced arbitration.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The restaurant in question wasn’t located in the park, so that clause was just as irrelevant.

      • Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Agreed but it isn’t as much a stretch as the disney+ agreement and serves the same purpose for their argument. The restaurant is on disney owned property right next to the park.