• cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually, the painter wrote a 6. They were commissioned to write a 6.

    Fuck your perspective, people should consider the original intent and research rather than just argue about it. Calling it “free speech” doesnt make it right or moral.

    • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Replace “original intent” with “context” and I agree 100% with you.

      I think that this is important to point out because we don’t really have access to each other’s “intention” (whatever this means); at most what they say and do, and specially for politics there’s often a big mismatch between the alleged intentions of a policy vs. what the policy achieves.

      Or, playing along the pic: if that random scribble is between a “5” and a “7”, then it means six, no matter if the author claims “actually it’s a nine”.

      (NB: I’m discussing this on general grounds, based on the image. I’m not from USA nor discussing its healthcare.)