• Bjornir@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    That is exactly the issue with algorithm-driven social media : they are the majority in their reality. It is distorted because of the algorithm, but nevertheless it is the world they are living in.

    • Krauerking
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Actually, literally this. The only people they meet online agree with them 100% and those that don’t can be bullied down into silence and it feels like it works to get rid if the opposition.

      Then it does absolutely fuck all for the real world where they meet people that disagree and don’t disappear when they click their heels together 3 times.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think it is worse that, if you want to make serious money off of running a social network, and dont want to actually have real moderation (which paying for essentially erases any serious profit margin) instead of ai crap, this is always how it is going to turn out. Bluesky might claim to be different but is just a slight reframing of the “problem” that leverages the high cost of moderation to set the stage for rationalizing centralization down the road.

      I mean yeah elon musk is a shithead toxic jerk, but it isnt like any other corporate social networks actually do any genuine moderation at scale that is legitimately effective at protecting people who are considered a target by rightwing trolls.

      You can either create profit for shareholders off of running a social network or have it be a healthy place for people, pick one.