• pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The classics are the point. These aren’t meant to be secretive killings, the signature is the message.

      They would use a different method if they wanted to obscure responsibility, dispose of the body, or do any number of things differently. Because they didn’t, means it was a public signing statement.

      Whether it was intended for one recipient, or many, who’s to say. Either way, you can be sure the intended party, or parties, received it.

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          Do you often find yourself in tall buildings and alone with oligarchs or siloviki?

          If so, sure why not.

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            So not the coworker who heats fish in the break room microwave? They’re not rich nor Russian … at least I don’t think so. I better be safe and just do it.

      • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        These aren’t meant to be secretive killings, the signature is the message

        Sure, but would it kill them to spice things up every once in a while?

        • pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s unfortunate that this method was initially used because it was an intentionally ambiguous method of assassination, whereas now it’s a signature assassination, with only a sprinkling of ambiguity for their local media.

          Just think, if they had started with tragic hot air balloon accident, death by misadventure with a jet ski, or pet bear mauling?