• DahGangalang@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Based on just the headline, you’re probably not wrong, but reading the article, you’ll see that those are anti-ballistic missile missiles (which is to say, they are missiles used to shoot down other missiles).

    There’s definitely something to be said about the U.S. support for Israel, but this feels like the most sane and agreeable area of support that could be provided.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      They are also are using these intercept missiles to defend civilian shipping.

      There’s an argument to discuss regarding entanglements with global shipping, Israel, and it’s enemies. But using a missile to save a life of a civilian sailor is also “sane and agreeable” as far as global military actions go…

    • knightly [none/use any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Hard disagree.

      Anti-missile systems increase the risk of war, because they allow countries like Israel to pretend their “Iron Dome” confers an immunity to reprisals and therefore be less likely to refrain from actions that would invite them.

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Well, call me crazy but maybe others shouldn’t be saving Israel from themselves? Those dumb fucks want to get into a regional war, let them have it.