The Justice Department warned Elon Musk that his $1 million giveaway could come with a prison sentenceā€”and it appears heā€™s actually paying attention.

After receiving a warning from the Justice Department, Elon Musk has stopped his $1 million giveaway to swing voters from his super PAC.

The tech CEO pledgedĀ SaturdayĀ to give away the hefty sum each day to one registered voter in a battleground state who signed America PACā€™s proā€“First and Second Amendment pledge. Every day since then, a winner has beenĀ announced: three Pennsylvania voters and one North Carolina voter.

However, the move immediately raised legal questions, as itā€™s a federal crime to pay someone to register to vote, punishable by a fine of $10,000, five years in prison, or both. Experts were divided, with Muskā€™s plan falling into a legalĀ gray areaĀ at best. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro called the move ā€œdeeply concerning,ā€ and author Stephen King accused Musk of ā€œpaying to register Republicans.ā€

  • savx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    if itā€™s illegal, just sue his ass already. you dont send warning to ordianry people who breaches the law right? at this point i have to say iā€™ll be happy if musk would continue the lottery, slapping a giant F word in the DOJā€™s face.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You send a warning and if they donā€™t follow it you can now apply for a harsher sentence.

      If you skip the warning you might win still, but youā€™ll have a harder time getting the harshest punishment.

      They could still charge him post warning even if heā€™d stopped, but then it looks like he cooperated and will probably not get the harshest punishment.

      Harshest punishment requires the warning and ignoring of it.

      • kungen@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        Harshest punishment requires the warning and ignoring of it.

        Does it say that in the law code? I thought that being ignorant of the law doesnā€™t matter for most prosecutions (ā€œignorantia juris non excusatā€)

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Not by law, but itā€™s just like first time offenders or cooperating defendants or guilty pleas often getting lighter sentences.

          They could still throw the book at you, as they do at times, but itā€™s not a guaranteed success.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      The grey area is that he uses the petition as a strawman. The DOJ will need to prove it is a strawman. At the same time the petition works as a filter to only attract republicans and put off democrats.

      I agree this should be persecuted but there is enough mud in the water for a drawn out trial and finally the criminals in SCOTUS to rule it acceptable.