• Im_Him@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Reading the comments here make me sad. People are so opposed to reading the underlying material and don’t see that media making claims like “nonprofit killing bill” is tricking them into clicking on the website.

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/9495/text/rh

    1. Administrative Review by the IRS Independent Office of Appeals (Subparagraph E):

    If the Secretary of the Treasury designates an organization as a terrorist supporting organization (e.g., under tax-related laws), the organization has the right to challenge this designation within the IRS’s Independent Office of Appeals. This process will follow procedures similar to how disputes involving IRS decisions are generally handled, as governed by Section 7803(e) of the Internal Revenue Code.

    This section allows for an independent review of the dispute by a body separate from the original decision-makers.

    1. Jurisdiction of U.S. District Courts (Subparagraph F):

    Exclusive Jurisdiction: U.S. district courts are granted exclusive jurisdiction to review a final determination about an organization’s designation as a terrorist supporting organization.

    Lemmy let’s be better and have some substantive arguments against this bill. Instead instantly being anti establishment/government.

    My arguments for the bill: seemly good determination of a terrorist organization and obviously nonprofits that support terrorist organizations should be tax-exempt.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s funny you accuse us of not reading when it’s obvious you didn’t read the article or Raskin’s criticism of the law. Hint: what you posted is covered and does not obviate the criticism.