• jellyfish@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s an upside down world where one thinks banning Tiktok isn’t censorship and government overreach; but having the freedom to chose what social media to participate in, is.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      A yes, like the freedom to buy a Windows licence to run basic software, or the freedom to have a TV that updates to include unremovable banner ads. The freedom to give all your freedom away, so essential for innovation. /s

      You’re argument is basically that you should have the right to to ruin yourself. Look, that normally has merit, because people know what’s best for them. But, I think it’s pretty clear that when it comes to tech people don’t know what’s best for them.

      Meanwhile, within TikTok, it’s pretty clear that censorship is openly endorsed. You can’t even say “gun” on TikTok, and god knows how much user information they have to “play around” with.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        You’re argument is basically that you should have the right to to ruin yourself.

        Look, I agree with you that TikTok is bad, but… YES, freedom means the ability to choose, good or bad.

        If you want someone to blame for this, blame the US government for allowing US tech companies to become so predatory and gross that young people literally prefer a foreign product that may be profiling them. It’s not like data collection and censorship isn’t rife on Xitter or FB, and the reality for most Americans is that the US government has more ability to use their data to directly harm them than the CCP does. No one is worried that the Chinese government is going to show up in Alabama with CPS in tow because a teen revealed they’re trans online.