• SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    Radiologist here. Yes the techs are supposed to have the patients remove all metal items (or any clothing likely to cause issues in the image quality) but in practice this is highly variable between locations/technologists. Sometimes the tech is never made to redo the image and so gets sloppy over time. Sometimes things are rushed and a mistake happens. For all we know this image was acquired, tech realized the problem and asked for belt to be removed then redid the image.

    One of my favorites was a gal who had panties on that had rhinestones spelling out “SEXY.” They were tiny and so it was kind of just a little subtle in the image but hilarious once you spotted it.

  • awake01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    In a medical setting we would never do an X-ray like this. Maybe airport security scanning or something like that, but this would mean you were a incompetent bad xray tech in a medical setting.

  • Kitathalla
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’d peg this one as a maybe. I have helped move foks onto the CT machine. I’ve wheeled patients into the x-ray rooms and watched as they get imaged before once again wheeling them to the next place. I’d say I have a fair bit of experience in this, and rarely do I see clothes actually being removed or them being cut off. Trauma? Sure, cut off the clothes (but only to the point necessary; you won’t see pants cut off if CPR is started, just the top stuff).

    If the purpose of the image wasn’t near the belt line, like a chest X-ray, I could absolutely see this appearing as a side note way at the bottom.

  • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve had a ton of X-rays but never had to remove my clothes for them… Cat scan, yes, but not X-ray.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think it depends on what is being x-rayed. I’ve always had to change into a gown if what was being x-rayed was covered by normal clothes.

  • m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    What did you find in the region under examination?

    His belt buckle, his huge smartphone in one pocket (now fried), and a wallet full of change in the other!

    And inside the body?

    Dunno, we couldn’t see it under all the stuff!

    People in here are calling bullshit on the bullshit, but I think it makes sense they’d remove obvious obstructions to the image like a belt buckle, even if they didn’t know it went further in the belt. The guy can hold his pants up for the duration of the procedure.

  • jago@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In line with the tenor of other comments so far, and as can reasonably be supposed to be supported by the experience of the millions of people in the entirety of medicine’s history who have ever undergone the creation of an X-ray image (most of which, one assumes, were made in a non-emergency situation without requiring the forcible and invasive disrobing of the subject), I think the true bullshit of this post can be found in the claims of this alleged “xray tech”.

  • lordnikon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I have for a fact taken an X-ray with a Pentacle necklace that I forgot to take off back in high school. when I went through my wicca phase. It was metal as fuck I wish I would have asked for a copy. This was old school film X-rays with film plates before digital X-rays were a thing.