• Odys@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m a straight old white male European, so hope you don’t mind me posting here. I’m just curious about what impact this will have? It seems to me, that “freedom of speech” can easily be interpreted that it’s ok to hate non straight people? Medical treatments might be impaired as well? Also: hate groups like Proud boys and White Lives Matter might very well feel emboldened to get violent, certainly after Elons “gesture”. As a European, I fear the worst as this crap looks extremely familiar. What are your thoughts/expectations/fears?

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      First of all, you’re absolutely welcome to post here as an ally.

      Secondly, I found an informative article on thr queer news website them which explained everything:

      [Link]

      The order, titled "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” was one of more than 200 executive actions Trump issued on the first day of his second term, […] disbanding federal programs on diversity, equity, and inclusion. […] the document seeks to redefine gender at the federal level, erase recognition of trans people in government communications, cease the issuance of gender-corrected U.S. passports, bar incarcerated trans women from being housed in women’s prisons, deny gender-affirming medical care to trans inmates, embolden transphobia in the workplace, and block federal dollars from being used to “promote gender ideology.”

      I live in the UK, so I only know what I’m being told, but the situation looks pretty dire over there.

  • millie@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 day ago

    I always find it weird that conservatives think this is some kind of gotcha for binary trans people. Like, okay, this is a shitty thing to say to nonbinary or intersex people and is both untrue and cruel. But how is this relevant to me, a binary trans woman?

    Like… hello my gender isn’t ‘trans’, it’s ‘woman’. Idiots.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      From the article:

      The definition of male and female will be based on whether people are born with eggs or sperm, rather than on their chromosomes.

      What did you say your gender was?

    • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      In fairness part of the decree is that it also can’t be changed, so definitely still an impact to both binary and nonbinary trans folks. Also love the downplay of enby impacts, if it doesn’t impact you it doesn’t matter?

        • Alice@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          How does your post contradict what they said? You asked how it impacts a binary trans person, and they explained that the part about it being unchangeable is supposed to target y’all (and all trans people).

          I know a lot of us, probably most of us, haven’t changed so much as taken ownership of who we always were. So yeah I guess technically this order isn’t a “gotcha”, but unfortunately that’s not how transphobes see it. :(

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m thinking trump and the Republican party are really bad, like cruel and stupid bad, and maybe we shouldn’t let them give orders anymore.

  • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ok.

    He’s wrong and we’ll all just ignore him and continue existing.

    Medical science will continue showing that sex isn’t and never has been a binary either.

    Laws can’t override nature.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Problem is this means that things we were hoping to get like having hormone replacement therapy actually approved by the FDA for use for transgender care will not happen and any enforcement of anti-discrimination or laws against hate speech at the federal level will no longer apply to trans and non-binary people. This will allow, for example, insurance companies to not have to cover transgender care. There is already a huge waiting list for people who are seeking care in the US due to the lack of specialists (myself included), so that list is likely to get longer. And likely any doctors who might have been planning to take up transgender care specialties may have their programs lose their funding. It’s a huge impact to a lot of areas of government and many industries to have the federal government not recognize transgender care as valid and not recognize non-binary people like me as people at all.

      Also, I’m fortunate enough to live in a state that is friendly to transgender and non-binary people, but my employer is not based here, so the insurance I have doesn’t have to obey local laws that don’t allow for blanket policies banning coverage of transgender care. So, the federal laws do matter.

      • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you for the correction and expansion.

        Hoping people will start making their own hormones etc. I understand the rest is shit though and I hope we can all start looking after each other instead.

      • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        The ability to read or not does not have anything to do with how much knowledge one can acquire, there are many ways to acquire knowledge.

        Don’t be ableist and harm people that don’t deserve it please.

        These people are just willfully ignorant fascists who think they can control reality

        No need to ascribe any other features onto them that don’t and won’t harm them but will harm others.

  • VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Jfc this is going to affect intersex people more than trans people.

    We were just at the cusp of addressing how fucked up fitting intersex people into one of two boxes is.

  • its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This is an executive order, not a law. That doesn’t make it any less terrible, however. Those commenting it is just political posturing are seriously misinformed at the wide range and scope this action will (not might, not could, WILL) have on you. Anything even tangentially related to getting work done, grants made, research funded with the federal government will be effected. In brief, the scope and impact of an executive order can vary greatly depending on the specific issue and the details of the order itself. This one will likely be meant to ensure that grant making, contracts, research, and legal recourse for those not subscribing to it’s narrow and, frankly, archaic definitions will have a very difficult time interacting with the federal government in a variety of ways. But again, we are entering uncharted territory where the legislative, judicial, and executive are now all openly corrupt and willing to harm and hinder rather than help people.

    I don’t think the general public realizes the sheer insanity of the new government and their willingness to go far to harm people they don’t like or don’t agree with. Therein lies the real danger. How this EO will be interpreted and executed across the executive branch will be purposefully cruel and targeted. With the recent spat of boot licking in SCOTUS, I fear we’re all in for a world of hurt. I’m just an ally, and I’m telling you that you absolutely must not bury your head in the sand on this one. You have to find ways to either protect yourself or protest/contest in a way you deem necessary for your health and well-being. Even a simple act of protest can mean a world of difference to those who are and will suffer.

    The only bright side is an Executive Order ONLY effects federal branches of government under authority of the President. They can be undone by future presidents and challenged/overturned after judicial review. Remember the “Muslim ban?” That was one example.

    So please, I beg you, do not brush this off as a Trumpism. This is meant to unleash the powers of hate, ignorance, and brutality that will latch onto as permission to be complete assholes.

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Knew this was going to happen with the election results. Everyone is telling me to keep calm. That the president wont effect the daily lives of citizens. Yeah I’m sure they told the american Japanese the same before the camps.

    • Aaron@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Find community. Meet in person regularly if you can. Just existing in community is huge, if for nothing else than your own emotional, mental, and physical health. We are thinking of you all from outside the US 🫂

      • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My workplace’s LGBT resource group is meeting soon. Hoping for good news. I’m wondering why I still live in the US at this point - I have no living family or close friends here and work in an in-demand field. May as well sell my house and move somewhere that I’m welcome.

        • Aaron@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I would suggest you look into it, at the very least! Leaving was the best decision I ever made.

            • Aaron@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              New Zealand! It’s not perfect, but with a population of only 5 million, we do a lot better taking care of each other. I live on the south island, so it’s even smaller. We have a fairly conservative govt right now, just like most places the economic downturn encouraged a right shift, but the culture here has been very progressive historically, and the people still are. I feel much more hopeful pushing back on hate here than I did in Texas, and it feels like it’s impactful as opposed to in the US where it feels like pushing back against a river.

  • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Legal laws can’t change scientifically established theory. If he wants to do some unbiased research though…

    …he’d probably prove himself wrong

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    this will more than likely get dragged through the courts for the entire term by multiple cases.

    plus there’s all the legislation that would have to be rewritten or repealed to support this ‘policy’, that would never get through congress without a larger moron majority than exists currently.

  • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The article title is misleading. It’s true that there are only two sexes, but Trump’s order is concerning gender, which is a spectrum.

      • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Male and female are the only sexes; intersex is just a blanket term for various medical conditions that describe abnormal development of sex characteristics.

        • Alice@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s natural and harmless to have any combination of male and female sexual characteristics, even if it’s uncommon. It’s only considered medical condition because we decided it was.

          My friend has a uterus and gonads. I have red hair and blue eyes. Both are super uncommon and neither has caused us any trouble, that’s just how we’re made.

          I’d argue that male and female are just names for the ends of the spectrum.

          • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yep. Nothing wrong with it. Everybody’s abnormal in some way. Doesn’t mean we should redefine scientific terms or “other” someone just because their abnormality has to do with sex characteristics.

            Personally, I go out of my way to not be normal, but most people want to fit in, and especially don’t want to be seen as different or lesser because of something they can’t control.

            • Alice@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              What’s wrong with redefining scientific terms? Unless you’re one of those “Pluto is still a planet” people, then I guess we’ll agree to disagree, but I prefer to update terms that no longer fit our understanding.

            • LukeZaz@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Doesn’t mean we should redefine scientific terms

              If “male” and “female” are the terms you’re referring to here, I’d disagree quite a bit. Language is a fluid and imprecise thing, and words are going to mean different things to different people, as well as change over time whether we want them to or not. Hell, just look at how messy things get whenever a transphobe tries and fails (yet again) to define these words in a way that doesn’t result in Diogenes walking in holding a chicken.

              The reality is that both terms are labels on boxes we try to sort people into, for better and for worse. There’s no good reason to get overly attached to them; like any categorization, they will fail regularly, as the universe does not care for the shapes of our boxes.

          • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Nobody said that. Nobody would say that. Be reasonable.

            If you’re actually interested in understanding what I’m saying, this article does a good job of explaining it in lay-friendly terms.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              So, if neither variation of sex characteristics nor personal identity defines the category of sex, then how can we define it? The answer is simple. The category of biological sex is defined through what developmental pathway you went down for the production of either sperm or eggs–the two, and only two, gamete types.

              Nah, variation in sex characteristics is a way better measure than gamete development, because variation in sex characteristics actually relates to the person as they exist now. Grown adult human beings are not gametes.

        • Drusas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          And some of them are not obviously male or female from birth, but are given surgeries to force them into one or the other. Sometimes they get it wrong.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are scientifically more than two sexes. Something like 1-2% of all people are intersex.

      • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’d think that, but really, I suspect a lot of the confusion comes from the word itself. “Intersex” implies with its “inter-” prefix that something exists between the two sexes, thus implying the existence of a third (or more) sex.

        But again, it’s just a blanket term that covers a wide variety of medical conditions related to development of sex organs/characteristics.

        And I shouldn’t have to say this, but of course I’m not saying that one’s anatomy has any influence on one’s worth as a person. I’m not a monster. I’m just a stickler for semantic accuracy.

        • LukeZaz@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I’m not a monster. I’m just a stickler for semantic accuracy.

          For what reason? What use does it have? Because as it stands, you’re arguing in favor of a false dichotomy that, though you may be against them, is still used by bigots to justify their hate. Weighed against “semantic accuracy,” I don’t really think that’s worthwhile.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        They will call it “multisex” and come up with treatments to “fix” the “medical issue”.