• wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    před 1 měsícem

    It literally DOES start with that! That’s the top level comment, word-for-word, which at least two people were too thick to understand. So yes, I gave a longer explanation, like I apparently must also provide to you.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      před 1 měsícem

      You asked “Am wrong?”.

      The content was fine but Your post was not as clear as the top post. That’s what was wrong.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        před 1 měsícem

        Yes, I added shiny metaphors, explications and implications, because the subtext of the original post was apparently utterly lost on both of them.

        Why use many word when few do trick? Because some people don’t understand the few words.