• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    That’s actually really good to hear. It really sucks that the animal component is almost pointless, and it seems to be more unethical to include them in the testing process, but it’s good to hear that at least the safety guardrails were working in the past.

    Seems we just need to rethink how to ethically test on humans from the start, though I worry about letting the current people in charge execute that plan.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hopefully it also means animal testing isn’t actually that important and can be easily phased out for alternatives.

    • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The good news is that some progress has been made in the US. The semi-recent (2022) FDA modernization act 2.0 removes mandates for animal testing in law and allows other testing methods to be used instead

      There’s another bill (FDA modernization act 3.0) that was just reintroduced a few days ago to not just allow the FDA to use non-animal testing, but to require that the FDA start actually working to allow it and setup pathways, rules, requirements, etc. And prioritize the review of drugs done via approved non-animal testing

      It includes various reporting, safety, etc. requirements laid out so it wouldn’t just be handing it blindly to the current admin

      The 2.0 act was suprisingly bipartisan, so it’s not a given that the 3.0 act would be doomed. Call your house representative and senators to make sure it gets through!