• tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Loops.video isn’t accepting new users atm. Even if it was, I got in on early signup and I have next to zero functionality out of it rn. Just informing the curious masses

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      Loops really isn’t ready for primetime. It’s too new and unpolished, and will need a bit more time.

      I wonder if peertube can scale. YouTube has a whole sophisticated system for ingesting and transcoding videos into dozens of formats, with tradeoffs being made on computational complexity versus file size/bandwidth, which requires some projection on which videos will be downloaded the most times in the future (and by which types of clients, with support for which codecs, etc.). Doing this can require a lot of networking/computing/memory/storage resources, and I wonder if the software can scale.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Youtube is probably the one that you can’t “Just Switch To Fediverse”

    Youtube content is mainly by creators. If they won’t leave, there will be no transition. And unlike reddit posts, you can’t just reupload. Because they will copyright strike you and take it down. Also, videos take up a lot more space than just text and some low-res memes like reddit-type sites.

    reddit is essentially a bunch of strangers talking to people, moving froms stranger Group A to stranger Group B is very easy to do. The reddit > Lemmy transition is probably one of the easiest. You’re just joining a new group of strangers.

    For everything else, your contacts will also need to switch.

    For Mastodon, the people you follow will also need to switch. This is even harder than getting your friends to switch.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      Hear me out.

      Creators should be hosting peer tubes. And they should host exclusively their own content. Fans of their can subscribe to whatever systems they want to pay and support.

      For creators, it’s a backup for when YouTube the project inevitably fails. For fans as well. But it’s also a backup of their content.

      • Statick@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 minutes ago

        Tech-savvy content creators, sure…

        Your average content creator that wants to make Minecraft videos? Unrealistic.

        I hate the monopoly Youtube has, but all of the federated alternatives have a learning curve the general public isn’t willing to deal with.

    • jonjuan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      You also can’t just switch from whatsapp to signal. I have hundreds of contacts on whatsapp that message me constantly there, and 2 on signal.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      A lot of youtubers make a living posting videos.

      They dont have a good enough reason to risk going to a much smaller audience with no ads and no membership system

      They also probably arent knowledgeable enough about computers to switch

  • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 minutes ago

    I got the PeerTube android app. It’s very bare bones. As a first foray into peertube I’m not sure it’s the way to go. I think I’ve set myself up for failure.

    Anycase, I’ll dedicate some time to try find some pocket of content I like tomorrow. Getting away from YouTube sure would be nice.

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m surprised this hasn’t been said yet… but what I hate most about Signal is its requirement for a phone number. I don’t want to be identified, and I want to be able to create multiple separate accounts with different identities if I want to.

    I also hate the fact that it’s a mobile-first service. Yes, there is a desktop application (and just one really crappy one at that), but it’s clearly designed to revolve first and foremost around your phone and be virtually impossible to use without one. As someone who hates writing on a 3-inch screen, this is a also non-starter for me.

    I understand the arguments about perfectionism, but this is too much. I’ll stick with XMPP, Matrix and IRC, thanks.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s meant to replace people’s text messaging apps with .i imal barriers to entry. People’s existing SMS/MMS contacts aren’t stored by user account names, but by phone number.

      When I added Signal to my device, I was able to open up my existing contacts and go.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        My understanding from what you’re writing (and from this article) is that the phone number is really the account number. That’s all well and fine, but then they force you to verify that the number is yours (or at the very least, one that you have access to because you need to receive a confirmation over SMS), so you can’t use something more private. And sure, it makes it a little harder to find your new contact, but I don’t think it’s really that big of a deal - just exchange your other “account number” via some other channel.

        Besides, don’t think for a second that when this identifying information inevitably falls into the wrong hands that it will benefit you in any way. “What are you hiding, citizen?” and all that bullshit.

        The part of it that bothers me is the sense of entitlement that these companies exhibit. The “Give us your phone number or fuck off” sentiment is something I just refuse to accept. If Google forces us to do the same and we refuse, what makes Signal think that we’ll do it for them when they’re so much smaller by comparison? Especially when you’re trying to claim you’re more secure and private to people that much more tech savvy than average, this just comes off as not understanding your audience very well. I’m sure I’m not the only one that is holding out against using Signal because of this.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          The last thing we need is more barriers to entry. People have hundreds of SMS /MMS contacts they’vebuilt up over decades. You can’t expect people to say “fuck all that” and start over from scratch.

          And you also WANT verification unless you want some bot setting up an account with my phone number so they can scam people pretending to be me.

          It really sounds like your issue with Signal is it’s not the correct service for your use. It’s like declaring a wrench bad because it’s not good at driving nails.

    • Statick@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      You need to sign up and wait for a beta invite. Took 15-30 days for me to get in. It’s not ready for primetime.

  • mergingapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Ok, downloaded peertube (because to hell with Google and YouTube) looked around… Um, is there not too much to look at right now? Are the people I normally watch on YouTube unable to be seen on peertube? Don’t get me wrong, all about decentralized everything but if the people I like aren’t there I’m feeling a bit up a creek.

    Or, more likely, am I missing something? Forgive me, please, I am rather new to this concept and how to work the federations and such.

    • Rawdogthatexe@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      It’s not an alternate way to view Youtube, it’s a totally separate service. You’re not missing anything, if no one’s using it to post content, then there’s no content. Youtube is a tough one to compete with because the infrastructure needed to host that much data and distribute it is insane. Peertube is super niche and not many know about it, but I do wonder how fast scaling would become a problem if it suddenly got an influx of new users.

    • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Are the people I normally watch on YouTube unable to be seen on peertube?

      Basically this. There are some creators that either switched or publish on both platforms, mainly from the Linux sphere (and, unfortunately, also some crackpots and/or scammers who got kicked from other platforms), but overall, it doesn’t have a lot of content, especially content that’s on a “professional” level.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      37 minutes ago

      Peertube is more like a “Proof Of Concept”. In reality, most content creators will not switch to it (or even care enough to learn about it).

      This isn’t like the reddit --> Lemmy transition, where you switch from Stranger Group A to Stranger Group B. If creators aren’t moving, there will be no transition. And, unlike with social media posts that you can repost, you can’t even reupload Youtube videos because you’ll get copyright take down notices (that the instance owner will legally have to comply with).

      Btw, Peertube federates with other Peertube instances, Peertube and Youtube does not federate with each other. And it’s not a front-end for Youtube either.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Loops really seems like it sucks. You can’t see how long any video is, there’s no way to thumb down really bad videos, and about 80% of all the videos seem like “really bad videos”. I never even used tik tok, but im sure it wasn’t content similar or it never would have gotten popular.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    (momentary confusion as I wonder why I’d want to switch from the X Window System to Mastodon)

  • Undaunted@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Unfortunately, the switch from YouTube to PeerTube has not worked for me so far. I can’t find a decent instance (not full of right-wing/conspiracy content) with interesting stuff that also allows me to make an account.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes finding the right instance on peertube is a nightmare — and also the general lack of quality content, or subtitling, which makes it as good as useless for deaf people like me.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Absolutely, signal isn’t federated, but I don’t want my messaging app to be federated. I want my social media to be federated. Lemmy is good because it’s open. Signal is good because it’s shut.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Element/matrix aren’t part of the fediverse, either. It doesn’t speak AP.

      • Matombo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        afaik ap is not a hard requirement for being in the fediverse, matrix is often included because it has the same federation idea

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Then email is a part of the fediverse? UUCP nets? IRC nets?

          All federated, none speak AP.

          I think a good working definition is “speaks the w3c standard AP”. Otherwise, its totally lost its meaning.

      • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Are we claiming now that Activity Pub is the only protocol that we can use for the fediverse? I think XMPP is roughly 30 years old at this point, and I’m pretty sure Activity Pub is much younger than that. I could be wrong though.

        But regardless, I don’t see why Activity Pub has to be the only protocol we accept to be considered a part of the fediverse. It’s not even like different AP implementations talk to each other all that well. My understanding is that Mastodon doesn’t federate that well with Lemmy, and I haven’t seen Loops or Pixelfed on Lemmy yet either.

        I’d be happy to be corrected on any of this though, I haven’t looked too closely into exactly how AP works or how it’s supposed to interoperate with different applications.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I mean, yeah… the fediverse, specifically, are AP servers, which is why we don’t include diaspora for it.

          It’s decentralized and federated, to be sure, just not the “fediverse”.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’d like to argue that using AP is an inconsistent rule for membership. For example, Diaspora has been considered to be part of the fediverse from early on, but it doesn’t use AP.

        I don’t really know where to draw the line. AP simply isn’t suitable for some applications, but it makes sense to include it for branding

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t know of anyone who include d*, accepting the tiny number of d* pods that also speak AP.

          I mean, nostr is also NOT part of the fediverse, but another federated and decentralized network.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The Lemmy logo always looks so sad or angry to me. Wished he could look happier.

      The only ones on the right I really like are signal and friendica. (I had never seen the friendica logo before. This is really well done whoever designed that. Good job.)

      All the big guys of course can afford graphic design teams and marketing/PR research.

      The notable exception for me is mastodon. While I’m still not a big fan of that logo either, it certainly looks better than the X logo. I’m guessing Musk DOGE’d his design teams in favor of some yes-men.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think it’s just the colours for the peertube one. I like that it’s three individual play icons to signify the federation aspect, but the colours are just dull.

    • LoganNineFingers@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It could be but I find the android app buggy (this month I’ve been using bookwyrm, GR, Open Reads, and The Story Graph to compare them all and still nothing is as smooth as GR. Plus bookwyrm has no apple app. I love where Bookwyrm is going but right now the switch is not the best

  • Souroak@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Anyone on Loops? I tried signing up a few days ago, but the sign up page wasn’t working. Now the landing page says they aren’t accepting new users.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It took a day before I got my activation email. There was no indication on the website it was gonna take that long, but I’m guessing it’s early enough that it might still require manual approval.

      That said it’s still very much a ghost town