Toes♀@ani.social to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.org · 4 days agoDebian Trixie raises x86 minimum requirements to i686.www.debian.orgexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up138arrow-down1external-linkDebian Trixie raises x86 minimum requirements to i686.www.debian.orgToes♀@ani.social to Free and Open Source Software@beehaw.org · 4 days agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareThe_Decryptor@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days ago I take that there isn’t much motivation in moving to 128 because it’s big enough; it’s only 8 cycles (?) to fill a 512 (that can’t be right?). 8 cycles would be an eternity on a modern CPU, they can achieve multiple register sized loads per cycle. If we do see a CPU with 128 bit addresses anytime soon, it’ll be something like CHERI, where the extra bits are used for flags.
8 cycles would be an eternity on a modern CPU, they can achieve multiple register sized loads per cycle.
If we do see a CPU with 128 bit addresses anytime soon, it’ll be something like CHERI, where the extra bits are used for flags.