Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    Starting things off here with a sneer thread from Baldur Bjarnason:

    Keeping up a personal schtick of mine, hereā€™s a random prediction:

    If the arts/humanities gain a significant degree of respect in the wake of the AI bubble, it will almost certainly gain that respect at the expense of STEMā€™s public image.

    Focusing on the arts specifically, the rise of generative AI and the resultant slop-nami has likely produced an image of programmers/software engineers as inherently incapable of making or understanding art, given AI slopā€™s soulless nature and inhumanly poor quality, if not outright hostile to art/artists thanks to gen-AIā€™s use in killing artistsā€™ jobs and livelihoods.

    • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      That article is hilarious.

      So I devised an alternative: listening to the work as an audiobook. I already did this for the Odyssey, which I justified because that work was originally oral. No such justification for the Bible. Oh well.

      Apparently, having a book read at you without taking notes or research is doing humanities.

      [ā€¦] I wrote down a few notes on the text I finished the day before. Iā€™m still using Obsidian with the Text Generator plugin. The Judeo-Christian scriptures are part of the LLMā€™s training corpus, as is much of the commentary around them.

      Oh, we are taking notes? If by taking notes you mean prompting spicy autocomplete for a summary of the text you didnā€™t read. I am sure all your office colleagues are very impressed, but be careful around the people outside of the IT department they might have an actual humanities degree. You wouldnā€™t want to publicly make a fool out of yourself, would you?

    • saucerwizard@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      If the arts/humanities gain a significant degree of respect

      I canā€™t see that happening - my degree has gotten me laughed out of interviews before, and even with a AI implosion I canā€™t see things changing.