• iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Their argument would, in your opinion, hold more value if they suggested (and did themselves) buy, for example, korean weaponry?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Their argument would hold if they recognized national defense as a public good rather than a profit center. As it stands, a continent fixated on juicing sales figures is not going to formulate an optimal security strategy. Its just going to become a new ballooning budget hole that feeds into the pockets of middlemen.

        There’s a huge difference between addressing a security concern and following a perverse incentive. And when politicians can profit from a crisis, you’re going to see new existential threats to Europe springing up as fast as business leadership can engineer it.

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I’m unsure how this comment answers my question?

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Because you’re phrasing the problem as “Who do I buy my guns from?” rather than “How do I efficiently secure the borders and deter foreign aggression?”

            • iii@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Ah, you changed my question, substituted an easier one, and responded to that. Thanks for explaining.

  • ScruffyDucky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Suuure, it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that France is the biggest arms manufacturer and exporter in the EU ;)

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Industry and logistics are an integral part of an army. It doesn’t stop at soldiers.

      That’s exactly what’s happening in Ukraine: EU lacks (military and other) industry to support very capable soldiers.

      The fact that France still has an industry is because they understand the above and value defense. If others did too, Ukraine would be in a better military position.