• mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Scrum is not about any of the things that Scrum proponents claim it’s about.

      Specifically, it’s not about agility, it’s not about velocity, it’s not about quality, it’s not about including the “customer”, and it’s only about a kind of transparency that has absolutely no impact on the final product.

      But yeah, it’s about some kind of transparency.

      • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Specifically, you would have to put in effort to be more wrong.

        Go read the scrum manifest.

        In reality, companies always adapt for what they think suits them. Very rarely do you actually use scrum completely as intended, that’s fine. But you don’t blame the cow when the cook burned your steak. You blame the cook.

        • mmddmm@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh, Scrum has a manifesto now? Where is it?

          Or you meant the Agile manifesto, that Scrum breaks half the items and does nothing about the other half?

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Perhaps poorly translated, they call it the scrum guide in English

            https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html

            I don’t know what parts you are talking about since you’re not specific.

            Furthermore. Kanban is just a method of keeping track of who does what and what the progress of that is. You can use kanban in waterfall. You can use kanban in scrum. No one is just using kanban and nothing else. As your post seems to think.