Nemeski@lemm.ee to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 8 个月前Undocumented backdoor found in Bluetooth chip used by a billion deviceswww.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up1190arrow-down15cross-posted to: homeassistant@lemmy.worldprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmy.worldcybersecurity@infosec.pub
arrow-up1185arrow-down1external-linkUndocumented backdoor found in Bluetooth chip used by a billion deviceswww.bleepingcomputer.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Cybersecurity@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 8 个月前message-square30linkfedilinkcross-posted to: homeassistant@lemmy.worldprivacyguides@lemmy.onetechnology@lemmy.worldcybersecurity@infosec.pub
minus-squareSanctimoniousApe@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 个月前Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.
minus-squareFermiverse@gehirneimer.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·8 个月前Correct, but as bluetooth is possible over a certain range, “drive by attacks” might be possible.
minus-squareThe_Decryptor@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 个月前The “attack” is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.
Am I misunderstanding the article? It seemed to imply remote intrusion required either Bluetooth proximity, or physical USB access.
Correct, but as bluetooth is possible over a certain range, “drive by attacks” might be possible.
The “attack” is from the host side, any remote attack is theoretical and would depend on exploiting the software on the host first to then gain access to the BT chip.