TechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoWould you agree?programming.devimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1665arrow-down1147
arrow-up1518arrow-down1imageWould you agree?programming.devTechCodex@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squareasudox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoIt sure is convenient. You get a user friendly GUI. But the stability, the resource intensity and the spyware. It’s really a retarded decision to build your servers on Windows Server.
minus-squaremsage@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, but some software, and it’s usually a financial application, requires a Windows Server. I’ve seen it more than once, as I had to set up the machine, I was dying inside, but there was just no alternative that the accounting could use.
It sure is convenient. You get a user friendly GUI. But the stability, the resource intensity and the spyware. It’s really a retarded decision to build your servers on Windows Server.
Yes, but some software, and it’s usually a financial application, requires a Windows Server.
I’ve seen it more than once, as I had to set up the machine, I was dying inside, but there was just no alternative that the accounting could use.