You don’t need to watch the video. Tom Scott/None of the interview subjects ever point out how fucked this is, but basically the story is rich sadists would put coins in boiling water and then throw them at poor children to watch them endure injury for small amounts of money as a form of entertainment.

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    i don’t think it’d take very long at all for us to single out something you like & engage in with problematic origins. everyone’s all for complete cultural revolution until someone correctly associates something useful, harmless, or personally fond of with the bourgeois/feudal culture.

    a lot can and should be critically examined, reinterpreted, and rejected, but this is a democratic process. the greatest argument for hot pennies is the voluntary perpetuation and participation in the event.

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, I might. But that doesn’t mean I should intellectually defend it. If people consume media with wealth differences or racism, it normalizes those things. Even if someone currently enjoys that, they should still understand the issue with it.

      • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        what materially does hot pennies reinforce? are the people throwing pennies nobles? are the people catching them doing so to avoid starvation? what is being normalized that is so offensive to our sensibilities here?

        • Neptium@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is exactly my thought process. I really don’t see a big deal here.

          I didn’t put forward an argument in my original comment because I genuinely thought there was nothing much to argue about.

          It’s so trivial.

          Let the people have fun and participate in community events.

          It is, from what I gather, a small town anyways. It will affect like, what, 0.0001% of the entire population?

        • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The idea of money, the idea of the nobles. We shouldn’t do things that started as a nobel activity

          • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            the idea of the nobles

            it clearly isn’t, the elected mayor and citizens are distributing the coins

            The idea of money

            no-one’s eliminated that one yet, you’ll need to be a bit more patient on expecting people to not put cultural purchase on the medium for modern life, even in AES

            We shouldn’t do things that started as a nobel activity

            turn over your keyboard comrade. writing was invented for the noble class’ record-keeping and taxes. <—specious but i want to illustrate why we need to exercise restraint on stuff like this, especially before it gets to points like ‘urbanism and intellectualism are bourgeois’

            • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Obviously certain inventions can benefit everyone but was just available to the bourgeois first. Same with medical treatment. And no, this is a minor issue for now but overall we shouldn’t defend the use as a concept. The difference is that this encourages the past ideas whilst writing does not

              • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                writing absolutely encourages past ideas, when people have access to those old ideas written down, or advocate them through writing.

                and is the transformation of this ritual not a sign of encouraging ideas of the present? a female mayor, the ceasing of the heating of the coins, the lack of noble participation, couldn’t i argue that this festival has been ‘reclaimed’ and embraces democratic values now?

                • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, if a writing encourages the ideas of the past then it also must be rejected and suppressed. Writing isn’t inherently reactionary but this is as it can’t be used for anything else. There is no reason to reclaim concepts that we do not need