0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 11 months agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1197arrow-down10cross-posted to: singularity@lemmit.onlineartificial@lemmit.onlinebecomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
arrow-up1197arrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, U.S. Judge Says in Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.com0x815@feddit.de to Technology@beehaw.org · 11 months agomessage-square37fedilinkcross-posted to: singularity@lemmit.onlineartificial@lemmit.onlinebecomeme@sh.itjust.worksfuturology@futurology.todaytechnology@lemmy.helvetet.euaicopyright@lemm.eetech@kbin.socialtech@kbin.socialghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoThe only thing this ruling really says is “AIs are not legal persons and copyright can only be held by legal persons.” Which is not particularly unexpected or useful when deciding other issues being raised by copyrighting AI outputs.
The only thing this ruling really says is “AIs are not legal persons and copyright can only be held by legal persons.” Which is not particularly unexpected or useful when deciding other issues being raised by copyrighting AI outputs.