“Aren’t clinical trials for new vaccines double-blind with placebo controls anyways? Like this is standard practice.”
Reddit comment: https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1kczbn2/rfk_jr_plans_placebotrial_testing_for_all_new/mq6n4td/
“Not if a safe and effective vaccine already exists. Why? Because it’s unethical to not give someone protection from a preventable disease if protection exists.”
Reddit reply comment: https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1kczbn2/rfk_jr_plans_placebotrial_testing_for_all_new/mq6os2p/
“If a vaccine already exists, a lot of times the existing is compared to the new version. I participated in such a trial for prevnar (13 vs. 20). when they were testing a version that covers more strains of a bacteria or virus.”
Reddit reply comment: https://old.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1kczbn2/rfk_jr_plans_placebotrial_testing_for_all_new/mq6pnvo/
“We’ve arranged a global civilization in which most crucial elements profoundly depend on science and technology. We have also arranged things so that almost no one understands science and technology. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and power is going to blow up in our faces.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Public teaching of Remedial Morality.
How to distinguish good from bad. Remedial interpretation concerns 1. intended as a remedy 2. concerned with the correction of faulty study habits and the raising of a pupil’s general competence
it is long long long overdue. Community created April 9, 2025.
SPECIAL CONTENT for urgent situations: Can North American nation ever escape the media ecology waves of Eternal September late year 1993?
…
Do you believe in Rock and Roll? Can Music save your morality soul?