Yes, in the quoted scene Juliet is asking why Romeo has to be a Montague with whom her family is feuding:
O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo?
Deny thy father and refuse thy name.
Or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love
And I’ll no longer be a Capulet.
‘Tis but thy name that is my enemy:
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What’s Montague? It is nor hand nor foot
Nor arm nor face nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O be some other name.
What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name, which is no part of thee,
Take all myself.
So what you’re saying is it’s misused here. I learn something new every day!
Yes, in the quoted scene Juliet is asking why Romeo has to be a Montague with whom her family is feuding:
Yeah. In the original, she’s not asking where he is but rather why he is [part of the family hers is in a feud with].
Just gotta add some bonus panels, forbidden romance always sells.