Absolutely great read from Bernard Hickey on Hipkins’ wealth tax announcement and the treasury report released yesterday:

That’s it. It will now be almost impossible for a wealth or capital gains tax to be implemented within the next decade or two.

The future of Aotearoa’s political economy will now remain frozen in its stagnant, unequal, unjust, unproductive and unhealthy state for the forseeable future. That’s what our leaders, and ultimately the only voters that matter, have decided. Those hoping to change that frozen landscape should now look after themselves and their families, and/or hope and work for an electoral miracle that gives parties who want such taxes dominant positions in any post-election negotiation.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Inheritance tax isn’t taxing earnings, it’s more like taxing a gift. Someone has built that wealth, paid tax on those earnings, and now that they want to pass that onto their children, the government wants another bite.

    It’s wrong, in my view. The underlying principle is wrong.

    • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true to a point. The solution is to make it kick in at amounts above what most people will pass on and as a result you prevent dynasties forming that damage society and over time, amass so much wealth that eventually mean others can’t build up anything to pass on to their children.

      Being against inheritance taxes outright is actually worse for the outcomes you want.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The solution is to make it kick in at amounts above what most people will pass on

        I’m also not a fan of this type of thinking either. If it’s wrong to do, it’s wrong to do it to anyone. The whole “it’s only x% of the population” argument just makes me uneasy.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What percentage of the population pays some form of income tax, would you say? I’m not sure how you think the two are comparable.

            • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re comparable because they’re both applied progressively. Income tax rates scale at higher income points. Wealth tax, inheritance tax, whatever it is. If they’re set to kick in at a certain threshold everyone pays the same amount up to that point - zero.

    • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I earn money I pay taxes on it. When I spend that money the business takes money that I already paid taxes on and also pays taxes on top. Apparently there is nothing wrong with double taxation.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. Those are two separate transactions, of course they are treated differently.

        2. They pay taxes on the profit, unless you’re talking about GST.

        • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Those are two separate transactions, of course they are treated differently.

          Just like inheritance.

          They pay taxes on the profit, unless you’re talking about GST.

          That too. Let’s put that in the mix.