• CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I dont even think this is related to the intelligence community, who are happy to spy on anyone regardless of age, I think it’s just a poorly thought out law.

    They definitely need to own the responsibility though. When these ID databases leak, and they will, hundreds of thousands of vulnerable people are going to be caught up in the mess, such as:

    • Closeted LGBTQ individuals, who may get outed.
    • Domestic violence victims trying to escape.

    Doxing/Outing these people will result in significant harm, upto and including death. These inevitable deaths with be on the politicians hands.

    And the worst part? It won’t stop kids getting online or bullying each other.

    Personally, I may just intentionally leak my drivers licence online, and get it reissued or something. Give plausible deniability to anything that happens associated with the ID. Not sure exactly what the ramifications are for doing that though.

    • shads
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I think pretty solidly this is being driven by business and intelligence communities, our police and spy agencies have been trying to get around encryption and online anonymity for years. They desperately want to be able to tie every bit of data that moves around the internet to an individual without getting the courts involved, and bear in mind since Australia is a Five Eyes nation not all of that pressure is onshore. It is getting the limpest push back from these big tech companies though because how much more valuable is your advertising profile if they can associate it with tour government ID, or birth certificate, or confirmed validated biometric data.

      I know of a Telco that had to pay to move a family to a different state after they provided their address to a man who posed a credible risk to their lives. They had to buy this family a new house, pay movers, and buy then a new car. The telco preempted the court on this so it wouldn’t become a national story in the media and they could minimise the eventual fine they faced.

      That one incident 2 decades ago cost more than half a million dollars to fix, uprooted a family and caused unknown amounts of trauma. Do we seriously think Twitter will take a similar incident as seriously? Google? Facebook? But I guarantee they will slurp up every bit of data they can.