• saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    NATO is entirely unrelated to this. You may as well have said any random military group from around the world.

    The one you’re.wanting.is USAN, though, by design—of which Venuzuala led the charge on—did not intend to be like NATO.

    • SalaciousBCrumb
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Odd that NATO ships had no problem intercepting Houthi attacks in the Red Sea.

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        By that logic, NATO is already in the waters off Venuzuala and it’s blowing up civilian ships.

        I think you need to learn what NATO is. You definitely need to understand that nations of NATO act independently or within other alliances every day, not as part of NATO.

        NATO had no stance on the Houthis; they have no stance on Venuzuala… These things have nothing to do with NATO. They’re just busy doing their thing, bolstering Eastern European borders against Russian drones—which is exactly what they exist for.