• Legianus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would say ideally not as they represent the state and thus should not wear iconography of any sort for secular states.

    I also know that this might not be exactly practial in reality

    • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think it shows minority groups they have representation and shouldn’t feel shamed for their beliefs. It also helps promote pride in diverse thoughts and backgrounds.

      • Legianus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think you are correct as it is now. And I do agree, as it is right now it is not practical to be completely secular for people holding these offices.

        However, ideally, these groups would not need the recognition in this way as they ought to already have it otherwise and understanding that at some places some things are limited, should not discourage them to believe in what they want.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      for a lot of people that is asking them to renounce their religious beliefs in service of the national interest

      • Legianus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes I see that problem and in the best case it would not be renouncing their beliefs not to wear something where it is not appropriate, but there are many other beliefs or reasons where one is excluded from official office/army, etc.