• BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    …kill him?

    I mean, or watch hundreds, thousands of whales die.

    Just one dude, man. I dunno, not Icelandic so it isn’t really an opportunity I’d have but, um. If all else fails, right?

    • musus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      He will probably kill 10-20 finback whales so we are not talking about very large numbers. Also it would not be good for Icelandic politics if someone would kill him, he could become somekind if whale killer martyr and Iceland would continue to kill whales after his death.

      • shottymcb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        he could become somekind if whale killer martyr

        Well that’s just as easily solved by more killing. There can’t be more than like 20 people in the country that have a massive boner for murdering whales.

        • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rise of far right politicians and fascists is directly related to the dramatic drop in assassinations of political figures.

          The solution? Start murdering fascist and far right politicians that exploit the working class and the environment to add to their already endless coffers. This is the only viable answer.

          Change my mind.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would it be more whales? Less?

        There’s a minimum whale population before genetic defects start having impact between mates…

        I’m not advocating direct violence, but mixing sand into the hunting boat’s engine oil and other more peaceful methods should be considered if the government won’t listen to reason by its people.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then you kill the next figurehead for whaling. Eventually, they’ll get the point.

            • Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              One that seems to have fallen out of favor the last few decades with these ultra rich fascist assholes being more prominent all over the globe the last decade or two

              • Serdan@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Killing someone is not inherently evil.

                See also tolerance paradox.

                • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Unless you subscribe to any one of most of the worlds’ belief systems. Or unless your parents did and some of it sort of rubbed off on you. Or if you think law and order is important. But outside of that, yeah, of course, killing is completely neutral moral gray area. /s

                  • Serdan@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Virtually all legal systems make allowances for killing someone in self-defense.

                    And you could probably fill a library with all the written works on the ethics of killing.

                    But yeah, sure, let’s just pretend that it’s completely self-evident that killing is always wrong.

                    Who said it’s morally neutral?

              • leftzero@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sure we can find volunteers willing to kill themselves once they’re done with the killing. 🤷‍♂️

      • Cabrio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then someone should kill them for their stupidity. Cancer doesn’t go away unless you cut it all out.