alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 months agoIt's routinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1846arrow-down113
arrow-up1833arrow-down1imageIt's routinesh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 10 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareMrSnowflake@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·10 months agoMissed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
minus-squareLetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·10 months agoSomething is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.
Missed an exclamation mark (as in negation) would be better and happens to anyone.
Or using < instead of <= or >
Something is either true or false, I would expect to have at least 50% of a chance to get it right on the first try. Nah, I fail to implement it three times because my brain went on vacation without telling me.