terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-210 months agoWhy I dislike snapslemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down126file-text
arrow-up1344arrow-down1imageWhy I dislike snapslemmy.dbzer0.comterminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-210 months agomessage-square102fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLaggyKar@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·10 months agoYour point 1 and 2 are the same a - app + dependencies Which will be duplicated for everything installed application, and redownloaded for every new version. Whereas flatpak and snappy shares the dependencies between applications. s/f - flatpak run com.very.easy.to.remember.and.type.name Snappy makes easily run command line shortcuts. Flatpak could use some improvements there though.
minus-squarejanAkali@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoYes… kinda!? First point is space requirement, second one is a design issue. They are directly connected, I’m not arguing that.
Your point 1 and 2 are the same
Which will be duplicated for everything installed application, and redownloaded for every new version. Whereas flatpak and snappy shares the dependencies between applications.
Snappy makes easily run command line shortcuts. Flatpak could use some improvements there though.
Yes… kinda!?
First point is space requirement, second one is a design issue. They are directly connected, I’m not arguing that.