You must log in or register to comment.
Imagine if the pigs had just, like, bought those kids shoes. You know, improve the lives of other people
Sincerely, not just a quote or a meme, fuck the police.
This just in! It wasn’t just the cops it was also NORFOLK FUCKING SOUTHERN!
The good news is that they dropped the burglary charges. The bad news is that they’ve instilled a distrust in police among the black community for at least another generation.
Good point. Did they buy a truckfull of Nikes just to fuck over some kids?
What did they do with them afterwards?
💀
Think you mean also good news for that last sentence. ACAB is an important life lesson.
Norfolk Southern, the fun boys and girls that chemo-nuked east Palestine?
The police would have infinite times more trust if they weren’t so hell bent on incriminating innocent people. From lying and coercing to you to get a confession, trying to search your home and vehicle without warrants and setting up traps that innocent people may fall for like this. There is no trust in the police because trusting them is the worst thing you can do.
Obligatory reminder to never speak to the police without a lawyer, they will use anything you say to attempt to convict you.
💀
Such petty things give those dipshits a sense of power
That sounds a lot like entrapment, which I thought was illegal.
I think it’s only entrapment in a legal sense if the cop tells you take the sneakers. Simply presenting someone an opportunity to commit a crime isn’t entrapment.
If a cop went over to the kids and said “hey look, that truck is full of sneakers and no one is around, so you should go take them” that would be entrapment. But the sneakers just being there and the kids on their own accord deciding they should steal them isn’t entrapment.
It’s a really shitty thing to do to be sure, but doesn’t fit the legal definition of entrapment as far as I know.
It’s only illegal if the kids know what entrapment is and go to court for it.
It’s not entrapment. See https://thecriminallawyer.tumblr.com/post/19810672629/12-i-was-entrapped for a good explanation of what entrapment is and isn’t. It’s commonly misunderstood.
Though what it is is a very sketchy use of police resources.
It is. But if the police ask them without a lawyer “did you steal those shoes” they dont know any better and will say yes. Then they can take that to court and their parents and say “They admitted to the crime” and then more bullshit continues. Thats why if you ever get arrested DONT SAY SHIT until a lawyer is present.
Don’t say shit is my go-to after watching every forensic files episode. Seems like pretty much everyone gets convicted by admitting to it.
Clam up and let the police work it out. It’s not your job to help them.
It’s called an attractive nuissance and it’s only bad if normal people do it.
Who’s gonna arrest them, the cops?
Holy Fuck. I went to Snopes thinking that I would find that this was bullshit.
It was 2018, but it seems to be true.
“the truck was locked and required considerable effort to break into, and that perpetrators couldn’t have known the truck contained Nikes until after they broke in and began ransacking it.”
That really changes to tone of the entire thing.
Fucking filthy pigs. Shit like that is why they have no trust left amongst the general population.
It’s just easy mode bullshit so they don’t have to do any real difficult police work.
Idk. The trailer was unmarked and locked. There were a lot of freight vehicles getting broken into, so they parked one and waited for another legit crime to happen.
Just seems smart tbh.
It just seems like an easy target to me. Anyone with even a passing knowledge of socioeconomics knows that crime, especially crimes of opportunity sky rockets in poor communities.
This is a case of “treating the symptom and not the cause”. Which is just easy mode bullshit policing. And another example of police prioritising property over people.
I think they just want easy arrests. It makes their department look good. Police is just a business in reality.
No, when a police officer incites it is. When a police officer merely places the truck in front of them but keeps it locked and doesn’t say anything to them it’s not entrapment. It is still however morally wrong and genuinely some of the most disgusting police conduct.
The truck was locked, had no logos, and the cops didn’t push them into stealing from it. Thus it isn’t entrapment
However, they placed it in an area where they knew people are desperately poor and regularly have to turn to illicit activities to make ends meet. Most truck drivers know this and don’t park their shit outside for this reason. To anyone older, this would look like an obvious setup. That’s why they targeted kids.
“Qualified immunity”
ACAB
It’s weird how in some places the police is the one with a criminal’s mindset.
They did actually have to apologize and said they wouldn’t do it again …
Pinky promise ;)
Are the kids wrong to steal, even if stealing was made easy for them? Yes.
Does that make this story any less dystopian? No.
Wrong to steal shoes in a random truck, yeah. Wrong to steal shoes, -literally placed there for you to steal-, I hope some of them at least got away with it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Bad spawn point
deleted by creator
And according to the snopes article someone else linked, their second mistake was being black
deleted by creator
I’d really like a link to this article
Looks like it was 2018:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/24/us/chicago-bait-truck.html
deleted by creator
You can get around paywalls trivially by going to archive.org and plugging the link into their search bar.
I’m not going to do it for you because it’s an Internet survival skill everyone should learn 😆
Thanks! i just now set up a firefox search keyword to avoid paywalls from the address bar.
I hear Google is full of links.
Like, it’s just links all the way down.
He does have a point tho. If you post stuff like this, post a link, not a screenshot. That’s just a shitty thing to do.
Always generates more outage if people assume it just happened… that’s why the clickbait websites usually don’t put dates on their “articles”
This post got kinda popular and so probably lots of folks that are not subscribed will see it. Please follow the rules pointed out in the sidebar, especially:
- do not derail discussions with your concerns about morality or ethics
You can always use the pinned post Why a(nother) shoplifting community to talk about why you think stealing is wrong.
First it is dystopian for others, then those you know, then you.
I saw a statement on here rather recently that resonated with me quite a lot: “Dystopian stories are not predictions of the future, they are criticisms of the current.”
These are the same people who are like “If you don’t believe in god how can you be of good moral character?!” and then pull shit like this.
This happened in like 2008 or 2011 if I remember correctly. These dipshits should be fired and barred from ever serving in a position of authority ever again. But they are bullies, so they’ll just find a way to lure a kid onto their property and shoot them “in self defense”.
It happened like six years ago and it’s shitty but the truck was locked and had no way of knowing what’s inside until broken into… it wasn’t filled with logos and shit.
It was still a honeypot, but it wasn’t like “I have things you want in me”
Isn’t that entrapment? Isn’t that illegal?
They should be given the same treatment users usually demand for pedophiles.
(Edit : as I wrote in a comment, this is not serious, I just wanted to know how people would react. Abolish prisons, courts and police)
I am not sure if calling for death penalties for cops is something that fits slrpnk.net or the solar punk ideals.
Instead I would like to point you to the !abolition@slrpnk.net community which collects resources on alternatives to our current punishment based idea of justice.
Personally I also like this text about executions: Against the Logic of the Guillotine, Why the Paris Commune Burned the Guillotine—and We Should Too
Well, I absolutely agree with you. My comment was a kind of … test ? I wanted to know how people would react to this. It always seems to me that cops violence is taken very lightly, even among progressives, while the most cruel punishments are demanded against other abusers.
Well, the (only) reaction I got was yours. I didn’t expect that.
But yes, in truth, I fully agree with you and I’m a committed penal abolitionnist. Feel free to delete my message, I’m all okay with it.
I think its a weird way to test the sentiment of a community. Maybe a question would have led to more reactions but I dont think anything need to be removed (I dont speak for the community on this instance tho)
