• caephi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    i’m about to take my first peek into linux on mint. i’m not completely put off learning some new things but being able to do that in a desktop that is familar makes everything a lot easier to pick up on. who knows, if it all goes smoothly maybe next week i’ll be running arch (i won’t)

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Getting the damn thing to install was a total nightmare for me .

      The instructions on their site had nothing step by step, -still no idea how to work checksums- so I had to figure out how to get an ISO onto a flash drive (turns out it needs additional software), how to get it onto the hdd without bios access (thanks Windows 10), then fight through tpm errors.

      Hell, even having to torrent the file in the first place was a pain since the machine I was installing on didn’t want to download the ISO.

      Took me all morning, but could’ve been worse in my mental fog, I guess

    • Venomnik0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mint is honestly the best one to go for really especially since everything just works there almost.

      • caephi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        just works “almost” is pretty funny but i know what you mean. i wasn’t having much trouble with it testing it with a virtual machine. the nice thing is a lot of the applications i use on windows are already free software that im realizing are a lot of the go to’s for people running linux, so really a lot should “just work”

        • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been using Linux on and off for ~15 years and I run Mint on my main desktop PC just because it’s so intuitive and stable. I want my gaming PC to “just work” and not need any tweaking, so Mint is perfect.

    • Lotsen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want a EAVEN more windows like distro I will recomend nobara. The official version is a windows 7 styled gnome and it is based on fedora.

    • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I used mint for a long time, the only reason I switched is that my Nvidia card was preventing mint to boot/install on my new laptop. I didn’t want to spent hours on it tried a few distros until one worked (Manjaro). I like Manjaro now, but might have to try mint again (laptop is a few years old so it will probably work now).

    • Gotoro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arch is easy enough to install. If you ever get tired of overhead, ala all the apps on the OS which you never use, just start from scratch. It’s not hard to install the base, desktop envo + a browser and start from there. The cleanest desktop you can imagine and probably the resulting OS too

      • caephi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        arch is interesting to me and i’m not too worried about the install, the rolling releases and stability of the system are what i think would snag me in using it. though the minute regular updates are probably more an issue for people who delve into the system more to get the absolute most out of it. it’ll be more stable, works out of the box-type distros for me while i get a grasp of things like the file system and using the terminal. but i do think the setups people post of their riced out installs look pretty cool ngl

        • Gotoro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rolling release being unstable is wrong. You don’t get the “dev” version of update with bugs and instability, you get a proper update, just in small increments usually. A lot of people who actually run arch will tell you the same, sometimes it’s even more stable than the major release type systems.