• lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Public spaces are for all of the public. A subset of the public doesn’t have the right to infringe on the rest of the public’s enjoyment or use of a space

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you put a blanket down on a beach, you are infringing on everyone else’s use of that space. So… what then? No one’s allowed to use public space ever, since any time someone does, the rest of the public can’t use it?

      The entire Earth started as public space, yet I assume you think its OK that people can build a house, put up a fence and say, “Mine”. What gives them the right? People need homes and the space wasn’t being used for a home. Well, now it is.

      Leave the homeless people alone.

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I mean, technically, your towel on the beach is very temporary. Unhoused people can be there for years.

        Your point is valid, but your argument is weak. Vacating unhoused people from the streets shouldn’t be the priority, the priority should be to address the underlying problem to let them get off the streets on their own. A lot of them are there because they had a traumatic experience in the shelter, they have a pet, etc.

        Unfortunately, we live in a society where we fix symptoms rather than causes, because it’s recurring revenue and is good for shareholders when you have “repeat customers”.