silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agoUS Department of Energy analysis says coal carbon capture project would emit more greenhouse gases than it storesenergyandpolicy.orgexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1133arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlineco2capture@sopuli.xyzcdr@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1133arrow-down1external-linkUS Department of Energy analysis says coal carbon capture project would emit more greenhouse gases than it storesenergyandpolicy.orgsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlineco2capture@sopuli.xyzcdr@slrpnk.net
minus-squarestarman2112@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down1·1 year agoOh man wow crazy it’s almost like the only way to stop bringing the carbon from outside the carbon cycle to inside the carbon cycle is to stop moving the carbon from outside the carbon cycle to inside the carbon cycle
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 year agoThe thermodynamic limits on carbon removal aren’t quite that bad, but the technology is nowhere near as good as the constraints physics imposes.
minus-squareWilzax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoWe need to build more nuclear plants and use those to power carbon capture devices, not MORE COAL
Oh man wow crazy it’s almost like the only way to stop bringing the carbon from outside the carbon cycle to inside the carbon cycle is to stop moving the carbon from outside the carbon cycle to inside the carbon cycle
The thermodynamic limits on carbon removal aren’t quite that bad, but the technology is nowhere near as good as the constraints physics imposes.
We need to build more nuclear plants and use those to power carbon capture devices, not MORE COAL