Quoting the author

I’ve starting working on a lemmy front end called lemmy-ui-leptos using leptos, a Rust UI framework with isomorphic support, and tailwind + daisyUI for the component styling. This could eventually replace the frankenstein’s monster that lemmy-ui has become.

  • van2z@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The weird part is that whatever they think of dictators, they would know the model, and that gives me a bizarre amount of trust.

    Can you explain this more?

    • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure! And I’m sorry in advance for the book, I’m literally around here studying this thing for this reason.

      So it might help to understand Soviet as a pre Bolshevik term more resembling ‘council’ than a unitary block like a nation.

      In the fediverse this is instances, they stand up, enroll users and give them voices. And if you graph a lot of the ethos it’s 1:1 from the ground up. For instance, you might say your posts here, once contributed are owned by everyone. You might also notice those with knowledge about the platform are maybe operating as a vanguard, you pick top or bottom (users and posts, or instances and software).

      Historically part of the problem with distributed systems of independent operating electors is how they’re vulnerable either to local tribalism, warlordism, and a need for some degree of functional central control of core ethos.

      The pile of ‘free market’ people mad at the phone company evolved into the modern Internet without a model, just chaos and genius. If the next wave is reactionary communists, we’re looking at something very different, but I’m not convinced it won’t mutate.

      if this is communism the platform: I’m genuinely curious what crowd sourced central planning offers. The people who have studied that system, and it’s problems, are the ones in who have started the project. And they started with ‘to each for each’ as it’s core principle, but it’s easy to fork any foss project.

      Part of what you learn when you start to read lefty philosophy is that they are (by volume and diversity), their own biggest critics. So there is going to be a plethora of times where we figure out of this is going to go pear shaped, and a ton of good or bad lessons that could come out of the canon.